Post 06 of 12
How ship managers automate marine invoice processing: capture supplier invoices, match them to purchase orders, route exceptions and post to finance.
Maritime invoice processing brings supplier documents, purchase orders, service evidence and voyage allocations into a controlled workflow. Automation can capture fields and suggest matches; finance teams still need clear rules for exceptions and approvals. Start with a defined invoice stream and measure the result against your own baseline.
Most accounts payable tools assume one company, goods receipts at a warehouse and invoices that reference a purchase order. A ship manager's invoices rarely look like that, so marine automated invoice processing has to handle a few extra dimensions from the start.
Several owning companies and vessels: the same supplier may invoice different legal entities, and each invoice has to land in the right company's books.
Allocation, not just approval: costs are assigned to vessel, voyage, port call or cost centre, and some are recharged to owners or charterers.
Services evidenced by reports, not receipts: repairs, surveys and technician attendance are confirmed by service reports or timesheets rather than a goods receipt.
Port disbursement accounts: an agent's account bundles many third-party charges that are checked against an estimate, often in a local currency.
Many small suppliers sending PDFs or scans by email, in different layouts and languages, which is where capture quality matters most.
Choose one document type, such as supplier invoices or port disbursement accounts. Document how it is received and what supporting records are available.
Capture supplier, invoice number, date, currency, amount, line items and purchase-order reference where present.
Map vessel, voyage, port call and cost centre identifiers using controlled master data. Retain the original document.
Check duplicates and extraction quality before routing the invoice. Low-confidence fields require review.
Agree the process and ownership before connecting systems. Keep document extraction separate from approval and payment authority.
Receive the document and record its source and receipt time.
Extract and validate fields; associate the supplier and operational references.
Compare the invoice with the purchase order and receipt or service evidence. Route differences to an assigned reviewer.
Obtain the required approval, post through the agreed ERP interface and retain the transaction reference.
Reconcile the posting and retain the decision history. Payment execution stays within the existing payment controls.
Microsoft documents three-way matching between invoice, purchase-order and receipt information. Apply matching policies suited to your records; some maritime charges need a different approval basis.
Missing purchase order: collect the contract or service evidence and route to the responsible approver; do not invent a matching record.
Amount or quantity mismatch: present the source values and configured tolerance to the reviewer.
Different currency: retain the invoice currency and document the approved conversion basis.
Port disbursement account: reconcile charges against agreed estimates and supporting service documents.
Matching confirms that an invoice is plausible. A separate set of checks confirms that it should be paid once, to the right party. Run them before the invoice reaches an approver so reviewers see the warning alongside the document.
Same supplier and invoice number already received or paid, including near-matches with spacing or prefix differences.
Same supplier, amount and date under a different invoice number, which often indicates a resubmitted or corrected document.
Bank details that differ from the supplier master: hold the invoice and verify the change through a contact already on file, never through details in the same email.
Corrected invoices and credit notes linked to the original, so the net amount owed stays visible.
Automated invoice processing works best when the boundary is explicit. The system prepares the case; a named person makes decisions that carry financial or contractual judgement.
Automation handles
Reading invoice fields and line items, with a confidence score per field
Looking up supplier, vessel, voyage and purchase order
Comparing invoice, order and receipt or service evidence against tolerances
Flagging duplicates, bank-detail changes and missing documents
Routing to the right approver and recording every step
Reviewers decide
Whether an extra charge or price difference is justified
How a cost is allocated or recharged when the rules do not cover it
Whether an invoice without a purchase order should be paid
Exceptions above approval thresholds
Anything involving changed payment details
Illustrative example, not a customer result: an invoice totals EUR 12,400 while the purchase order totals EUR 12,000. The workflow identifies the EUR 400 difference and attaches both documents. The reviewer determines whether the additional charge is supported and records approval or rejection. The system does not approve the difference merely because it extracted the invoice correctly.
Bring representative documents, the supplier/asset master data, approval rules and an ERP export or API specification. Confirm authentication, field mappings, retry behaviour and responsibilities before promising a live integration.
Start with capture and review, then matching and approval, then controlled posting and reconciliation.
Agree how unsuccessful postings, duplicate retries and corrected documents are handled.
Use a walkthrough to identify what is already demonstrable and what needs configuration or development.
Measure review time per invoice, matching rate, exception categories, posting errors and time to approval. Define the denominator and measurement period.
Compare a documented sample before and after the pilot. Include setup, integration and reviewer effort.
Treat reductions in processing time as observed only after measurement. Avoid importing industry percentages into your own business case.
Yes, but those invoices follow a different path. Without an order to match, the workflow attaches the contract, rate agreement or service report and routes the invoice to the person responsible for that cost. It should never create a purchase order after the fact just to make the match pass.
Treat each account as a set of lines rather than one amount. Lines are compared with the pro-forma estimate and supporting receipts, differences are shown per charge, and the reviewer approves or queries them before the final account is posted.
It depends on document quality and layout, so measure it on a sample of your own invoices rather than relying on a vendor figure. Use a confidence score per field and send low-confidence fields to review instead of posting them.
No. Invoice automation sits in front of the ERP: it captures, matches and routes invoices, then posts approved ones through the agreed interface. The ERP remains the system of record and payments stay under your existing controls.
Next steps
Use the Finance Automation page to scope a walkthrough around your documents, approvals and current systems. A practical first step is one invoice stream with a clear exception owner and a reliable audit trail.
How Delta BI can help
Maritime procurement software from vessel requisition to supplier payment, on top of your ERP. Running at a ship manager, freeing ~36% of purchasers’ time.
See how it worksStart with the decision
Tell us about your challenge. We will reply to arrange an assessment and identify a practical route to delivery.
Request a data assessment